Peer Review Partners and Directions

Group 1
Sirkku Enberg sirkku sirkku.enberg@gmail.com; Robert Staropoli Robert Staropoli robertstar1893@gmail.com; Yves Malvin P. Manalo Yves Malvin yvesmalvin@gmail.com

Group 2.
Allison Stroobandt Allison Stroobandt allison.stroobandt@gmail.com; Eric Dayoan EJ ejdayoan@gmail.com ; Rosagna Rojo Rose Rojo rrojo1121@gmail.com

Group 3.
 Jocelyn Garcia Jocelyn jocelyngarciaa@gmail.com ;

Caitlin Carlino Caitlin Carlino caitycorpse138@gmail.com; Pamela Leiboff Pamela leiboffpamela@gmail.com;

Group 4

Barbara Rivera - r.barbara25@gmail.com; Afeisha Carrington Afeisha Carrington eressa1986@gmail.com; Brianna Ferranti Brianna briannaferranti526@gmail.com;


Group 5
Diali Montavlo Diali M diali.april@gmail.com; 

Wilson Aldas wilsonaldas aldaswilson@gmail.com


Grzegorz Dziekonski GregD gresek19@gmail.com;

Group 7
; Clark Nicholas Clark cnicholas87@gmail.com

 Felix Rodriguez Felix R. felixrod93@gmail.com; 
polyakter55@gmail.com

When you are peer reviewing your peers' drafts, please pay attention and comment on the following:

-Does the introduction include a clear thesis and identifies the short story/stories as well as author(s) which will be analyzed in the paper? Does the thesis directly address the assignment?

-Does each body paragraph focus on ONE main idea which support the thesis? Also, does each body paragraph include sufficent and relevant quotes/examples from the short story/stories?

-Are the quotes and examples from the short story/ stories formatted according to the MLA?Does the paper have a Works Cited page?

-Is the paper written clearly? Does the write understand the main ideas and how they relate to each other as well as how these support the thesis? Also, if you notice any grammatical errors, do point them out to the writer.